Dracula
2000
AKA: Wes Craven Presents Dracula 2000, Dracula 2001
USA
2000, Farbe, 127 min |
|
|
|
Director |
Patrick
Lussier |
Screenplay |
Joel
Soisson/Patrick Lussier |
Photography |
Peter
Pau |
Music: |
Marco
Beltrami |
|
|
Christopher
Plummer |
Abraham
van Helsing |
Jonny
Lee Miller |
Simon
Sheppard |
Gerald
Butler |
Dracula
|
Justine
Waddell
|
Mary
Heller |
as
Jeri Ryan, Willa O'Neill, Michael Gough, Michael Scherer,
Jennifer Esposito, Harald Leipnitz, Manou Lubowski
|
For
around 100 years Dracula was sleeping as a log in a sealed sarcophagus
behind the thick safe doors of an antique shop in London. Of course,
this shop is situated in the former Carfax Abbey and belongs to
- guess who? Exactly, to Professor van Helsing. He is still alive,
as he regularly injects himself Draculas Blood, that he takes from
the vampire by means of leeches, because he once made the oath,
to stay alive until Dracula is decimated for good. It's bad luck
that one night there's a burglary at Carfax. The sarcophagus is
stolen and transported with an airplane to New Orleans, the place
of residence of van Helsings daughter Mary, who works in a Virgin
Megastore, a fact that is repeatedly and quite effectively shown
to us during the whole movie (you really end up wondering, why the
movie wasn't called "Virgula"). In the town of Mardi Gras
Dracula soon sucks together some helpers, who make life difficult
for van Helsing and his assistant Simon that followed him. Dracula
finds Mary and kills van Helsing. After a quite confusing and incoherent
chase with Simon now being the principal vampire hunter, Dracula
is burnt by the sunlight, dangling from the cable of an electrically
lightened crucifix over the roofs of New Orleans (directly across
the Virgin Megastore we already mentioned). Mary is free and takes
over her father's heritage.
Wes
Craven presents Dracula we read at the movie theatre, something
he better shouldn't have done, even if it can be assumed that Craven
only did so because his Cutter, Patrick Lussier was the director
of this miserable botch. Lussier is without doubt somebody who knows
his job, which is cutting movies. Such a man should not be on the
chair of the Director, as his debut movie clearly proofs. He makes
all mistakes possible. What was supposed to have an atmospheric
effect is only ridiculous and embarrassing, the story has immense
gaps and you keep on wondering what exactly happens, and why?
For the role of Dracula Lussier chose Gerald Butler, who perhaps
does look good, but unfortunately has neither charisma nor talent,
and appears somehow bloodless. Was there really nobody else available?
Butlers Dracula-Interpretation doesn't by far reach the performance
of any of his more or less legendary predecessors and first appearence
of the bloodsucker in the third millenium can only be called a complete
failure.
Perhaps
it would have been possible to make something good out of the stupid
story, but at latest when Draculas origin is explained it becomes
incredibly silly. Dracula is nobody else than Judas Iscariot, who
is cured by god to never die (what somehow happens anyway at the
end of the movie). The only positive aspect of the movie is Christopher
Plummer acting as Van Helsing, everything else is not worth mentioning.
This movie will find its place right down at the bottom of the video
store shelves soon, right next to Carpenters "Vampires"
from two years earlier that was similar rubbish. Fans prefer watching
Coppolas "Bram Stokers Dracula",
Jordans "Interview with the Vampire"
or even Rodriguez "From Dusk
till Dawn".
|